<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>novolocus.com &#187; 2007 &#187; May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novolocus.com</link>
	<description>Whatever Andy Burns is working on...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Nice list of fonts</title>
		<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/31/nice-list-of-fonts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/31/nice-list-of-fonts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics, Design and UI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolocus.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice fonts here. Now if there were some way to push them onto the client&#8230;
&#8230;actually, why the hell isn&#8217;t there? A truetype font is, what, 100-200k? Why aren&#8217;t these downloaded to some form of isolated storage, and used for display purposes in the browser. You can even, oh, I don&#8217;t know, have a font cache, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inspirationbit.com/16-best-loved-font-bits-in-web-design/">Nice fonts here</a>. Now if there were some way to push them onto the client&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;actually, why the hell isn&#8217;t there? A truetype font is, what, 100-200k? Why aren&#8217;t these downloaded to some form of isolated storage, and used for display purposes in the browser. You can even, oh, I don&#8217;t know, have a font cache, so you don&#8217;t have to download them repeatedly. Perhaps some sort of signing mechanism to avoid version problems.</p>
<p class="oldCommentOuter">Comments from my old blog:</p>
<p class="oldCommentInner">
<p class="oldComment">Yes - very good list. Myriad is a great font - it manages to strike a balance between being pretty, and practical too. Fonts are one of those areas where I benefit from having a designer for a brother, so was exposed to lots of barracking when I was younger and playing with DTP software&#8230; &#8220;make the line height 120%&#8221;, &#8220;make the body text smaller&#8221;, &#8220;no more than 2 fonts on a page!&#8221; and other rules of thumb&#8230;</p>
<p class="oldCommentFooter">By Jonathan at 18:06:08 Tuesday 5th June 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/31/nice-list-of-fonts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graphics and Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/graphics-and-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/graphics-and-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics, Design and UI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolocus.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coding Horror has blogged about developers needing to know graphics programs, and I agree entirely. Jeff&#8217;s right, we&#8217;re not designers, and never will be (I don&#8217;t even wear glasses, let alone &#8216;cool&#8217; ones). Don&#8217;t try and learn how to build beautiful websites if you&#8217;re a developer - either, you&#8217;re gifted and you already can, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coding Horror has blogged about <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000849.html">developers needing to know graphics programs</a>, and I agree entirely. Jeff&#8217;s right, we&#8217;re not designers, and never will be (I don&#8217;t even wear glasses, let alone &#8216;cool&#8217; ones). Don&#8217;t try and learn how to build beautiful websites if you&#8217;re a developer - either, you&#8217;re gifted and you already can, or there is simply too much learning involved.</p>
<p>But we can build &#8216;fair&#8217; sites, and rough mock ups. Every site doesn&#8217;t have to be a work of art, just as every ceiling doesn&#8217;t have to be the Sistine chapel. As developers, we should make an effort to not build websites that look crap.</p>
<p>And if you need to build the Sistine chapel, remember it&#8217;s a team effort. You can build the structure - and get a specialist to make the ceiling pretty.</p>
<p><a href="http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/softwaretutorials/Graphics_Software_Tutorials_and_User_Resources.htm">Link to some tutorials</a> Jeff provided (note to self - take a look)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/graphics-and-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get around workflow version issues - and better ways to start workflows</title>
		<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/get-around-workflow-version-issues-and-better-ways-to-start-workflows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/get-around-workflow-version-issues-and-better-ways-to-start-workflows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolocus.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workflow versioning in SharePoint by Daniel Herzog. Yeah, it&#8217;s a problem that I&#8217;ve been wondering about, and his suggestions are valid. I was interested by the link to Start workflows from the context menu - to me, this is a much more natural place to start a workflow from.
Found from Julie&#8217;s Blog
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://blogs.pointbridge.com/Blogs/herzog_daniel/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=4">Workflow versioning in SharePoint</a> by Daniel Herzog. Yeah, it&#8217;s a problem that I&#8217;ve been wondering about, and his suggestions are valid. I was interested by the link to <a href="https://blogs.pointbridge.com/Blogs/herzog_daniel/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=afde6a39-54e6-4134-af39-ef4f08b950dd&amp;ID=2">Start workflows from the context menu</a> - to me, this is a much more natural place to start a workflow from.</p>
<p>Found from <a href="http://www.novolocus.com/wp-admin/%22http://blogs.officezealot.com/jkremer/archive/2007/05/02/20330.aspx%22">Julie&#8217;s Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novolocus.com/2007/05/03/get-around-workflow-version-issues-and-better-ways-to-start-workflows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
