<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuff I forgot to style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novolocus.com/2008/11/04/stuff-i-forgot-to-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2008/11/04/stuff-i-forgot-to-style/</link>
	<description>Whatever I'm working on, really...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2008/11/04/stuff-i-forgot-to-style/comment-page-1/#comment-4540</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolocus.com/?p=887#comment-4540</guid>
		<description>Phew... toughie.

The short answer - no, I don&#039;t. But I do try to recommend to clients that they:

1) Consider doing away with the out-of-box page layouts. Some of them are just plain strange. The only one that doesn&#039;t seem to be isn&#039;t a publishing Page Layout - but is the Team Site default.aspx page, with a wide main column and a narrow right column.

2) Sit down with a piece of page and decide how they want their page to look. Seriously, think newspapers and the like - one or two columns, 50:50, 66:33 or 75:25 % widths, Images fitting amongst text, etc.. Use Description columns to provide a synopsis, etc.. Page Layouts should be designed properly like this for each Page content  type used in Publishing.

But to be honest, what &#039;Clean an consistent&#039; is is an personal aesthetic choice. To be honest, if I&#039;m trying for a slightly cleaner look in one easy step, I just apply the &#039;Simple&#039; theme.

And if you&#039;ve built your own master page, you&#039;ve got to be careful that your styling problems aren&#039;t a result of your new master page (SharePoint&#039;s design does assume the use of certain styles/page elements) or the styles for your new design. It can be time consuming making sure that you&#039;re overridden all the styles you need to to rebrand a site. 

But without actually seeing what you&#039;re talking about, it&#039;s hard to offer useful advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew&#8230; toughie.</p>
<p>The short answer &#8211; no, I don&#8217;t. But I do try to recommend to clients that they:</p>
<p>1) Consider doing away with the out-of-box page layouts. Some of them are just plain strange. The only one that doesn&#8217;t seem to be isn&#8217;t a publishing Page Layout &#8211; but is the Team Site default.aspx page, with a wide main column and a narrow right column.</p>
<p>2) Sit down with a piece of page and decide how they want their page to look. Seriously, think newspapers and the like &#8211; one or two columns, 50:50, 66:33 or 75:25 % widths, Images fitting amongst text, etc.. Use Description columns to provide a synopsis, etc.. Page Layouts should be designed properly like this for each Page content  type used in Publishing.</p>
<p>But to be honest, what &#8216;Clean an consistent&#8217; is is an personal aesthetic choice. To be honest, if I&#8217;m trying for a slightly cleaner look in one easy step, I just apply the &#8216;Simple&#8217; theme.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;ve built your own master page, you&#8217;ve got to be careful that your styling problems aren&#8217;t a result of your new master page (SharePoint&#8217;s design does assume the use of certain styles/page elements) or the styles for your new design. It can be time consuming making sure that you&#8217;re overridden all the styles you need to to rebrand a site. </p>
<p>But without actually seeing what you&#8217;re talking about, it&#8217;s hard to offer useful advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian DeFazio</title>
		<link>http://www.novolocus.com/2008/11/04/stuff-i-forgot-to-style/comment-page-1/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian DeFazio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolocus.com/?p=887#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>Andy,

do you know of any good templates for making a clean and consistent page layout in a SharePoint intranet environment?  I can create a good IA structure and use web parts like CQWP to display this information, but I&#039;m having serious problems with branding.  I&#039;m just not a look and feel developer.  Any suggestions on what I can do to have a clean and consistent interface throughout the site?  In addition, any suggestions on where to start?  I think we have a good master page layout that handles our top navigation and left nav, but the content within the actual pages just looks bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>do you know of any good templates for making a clean and consistent page layout in a SharePoint intranet environment?  I can create a good IA structure and use web parts like CQWP to display this information, but I&#8217;m having serious problems with branding.  I&#8217;m just not a look and feel developer.  Any suggestions on what I can do to have a clean and consistent interface throughout the site?  In addition, any suggestions on where to start?  I think we have a good master page layout that handles our top navigation and left nav, but the content within the actual pages just looks bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
