Comments on: Feature Stapling for Branding http://www.novolocus.com/2009/02/12/feature-stapling-for-branding/ Whatever I'm working on, really... Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:09:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Andy http://www.novolocus.com/2009/02/12/feature-stapling-for-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-4973 Andy Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:05:58 +0000 http://www.novolocus.com/?p=1023#comment-4973 Erm, well, the page is interesting, but that page is relevant to a bit more than just branding. Although having a site definition to base your branding off, and then using features to deploy the branding resources is certainly a good way to go. It is something that a lot of folks don't pick up on - that branding can include custom Publishing Page types, Page Layouts, and other content types. But I suspect that what I've been blogging about is slightly less 'architecture' and more 'designy' Erm, well, the page is interesting, but that page is relevant to a bit more than just branding. Although having a site definition to base your branding off, and then using features to deploy the branding resources is certainly a good way to go.

It is something that a lot of folks don’t pick up on – that branding can include custom Publishing Page types, Page Layouts, and other content types.

But I suspect that what I’ve been blogging about is slightly less ‘architecture’ and more ‘designy’

]]> By: Jeremy Thake http://www.novolocus.com/2009/02/12/feature-stapling-for-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-4972 Jeremy Thake Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:06:32 +0000 http://www.novolocus.com/?p=1023#comment-4972 Be interesting to get your opinions on this wiki page as I'm trying to get an overall feel for pros and cons of each approach to branding. http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Site+Features+vs+Site+Templates+vs+Site+Definitions Be interesting to get your opinions on this wiki page as I’m trying to get an overall feel for pros and cons of each approach to branding.

http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Site+Features+vs+Site+Templates+vs+Site+Definitions

]]>